Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CIPRA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv05326
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ELGA CIPRA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cipra et al v. King et al
as 1:2018cv01562
Plaintiff:
Janette Cipra and Paul D. Cipra
Defendant:
John E. King and James Boone Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cipra v. King, et al
as 1:2018cv00634
Defendant:
John E. King and James Boone Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul Cipra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Donald Cipra
as 14-2792
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD P. CIPRA
CIPRA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03288
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN CIPRA
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BORENI et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05830
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BORENI , VERA MASSEY , FRANK MASSEY and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boreni et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03152
Plaintiff:
Patricia Boreni , Vera Massey , Frank Massey and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Boreni et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03152
Plaintiff:
Patricia Boreni , Vera Massey , Frank Massey and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Donald Cipra
as 12-3645
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD P. CIPRA
Ingram v. Cherokee Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2012cv02505
Plaintiff:
Johnny Loyd Ingram
Defendant:
Cherokee Sheriff's Office, Holly Springs Police Department, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
