Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
as 24-1726
Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
RAMOT AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY LTD.
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
as 24-1727
Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
RAMOT AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY LTD.
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
as 24-1728
Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
RAMOT AT TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY LTD.
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al. v. Dexon Computer, Inc.
as 24-265
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
DEXON COMPUTER, INC.
In re Application of Mala Technologies Ltd. for Discovery in Aid of Foreign Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
as 5:2023mc80266
Plaintiff:
In re Application of MALA TECHNOLOGIES LTD. for Discovery in Aid of Foreign Litigation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 and Mala Technologies
In Re:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
as 23-2027
Appellant:
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC
Appellee:
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
TFORCE FREIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. VirnetX Inc.
as 23-1809
Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Appellee:
VIRNETX INC.
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al v. Wilson Chung, et al
as 23-15590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
WILSON CHUNG and PLANTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
JAMES HE, JEDD WILLIAMS and THOMAS PUORRO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
