Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. Hunter
as 2:2011cv01441
Petitioner:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA
Respondent:
David Hunter
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
Laura Hoffman v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
as 11-55106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURA HOFFMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
C. PRADA, S. SOYKA and HOWARD STRONG
Objector:
JOSEPH BALLA, ANDREW J. CESARE and TODD BATES
Defendant:
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Laura Hoffman, et al v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
as 11-55085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURA HOFFMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
JOSEPH BALLA, ANDREW J. CESARE and TODD BATES
Objector:
C. PRADA
Defendant:
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Laura Hoffman, et al v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
as 11-55085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA HOFFMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellant:
JOSEPH BALLA, ANDREW J. CESARE and TODD BATES
Other:
C. PRADA
Defendant:
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA NA
Johan Backlund v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA et al
as 5:2010cv01527
Plaintiff:
Johan Backlund
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA and Does
Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. Julie Ngo
as 5:2010cv01405
Counter Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA and Roes
Plaintiff:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA
Counter Claimant:
Julie Ngo
Defendant:
Julie Ngo
Sharon Haney v. Hunt and Henriques et al
as 8:2010cv00659
Counter Claimant:
Citibank South Dakota NA
Defendant:
Citibank South Dakota NA and Hunt and Henriques
Counter Defendant:
Sharon Haney and ROES 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Sharon Haney
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
