Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. BRIDGES
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
ROYAL A SMITH and RICHARD E. BRIDGES ESQ.
Interested Party:
CITIZENS BANK NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Coley v. Citizens Bank, NA
as 1:2018cv00694
Plaintiff:
Russell Wydell Coley
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, NA and Citizens Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv12110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Citizens Bank, NA v. Trilegiant Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
Citizens Bank, NA
Defendant:
Trilegiant Corporation, Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., Affinion Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
MRyan v. RBS Citizens Bank, NA et al
as 1:2016cv10637
Plaintiff:
Robin MRyan
Defendant:
RBS Citizens Bank, NA and Stephen T. Gannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Halliwell, et al
as 1:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
The Bank Of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Richard A. Halliwell, Elizabeth A. Halliwell, Citizens Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLJ Managment LLC et al v. DeCiccio et al
as 1:2015cv00375
Plaintiff:
SLJ Managment LLC and Shrem Shmuel
Defendant:
Donald F. DeCiccio, Citizens Financial Group,Inc. and Citizens Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Citizens Financial Group Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, LP
Defendant:
Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Citizens Bank, Citizens Bank of New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
