Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Peck v. City of Anderson
as 2:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Peck
Defendant:
City of Anderson
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Peck v. City of Anderson
as 2:2015at00351
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Peck
Defendant:
City of Anderson
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
THE CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANA v. HY-TECH MACHINING SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Defendant:
ANGSTROM USA, LLC, O. DAN FERREE, KELLY S. GASKILL and others
Plaintiff:
THE CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JWJ, LLC v. INDUSTRIAL REMOVAL, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01506
Defendant:
BIG B. RUBBISH REMOVAL, CITY OF ANDERSON, GENERAL MOTORS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JWJ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FINSTER v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2014cv01310
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FINSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robin Allman, et al v. Kevin Smith, et al
as 14-1792
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBIN ALLMAN, MARGARET BAUGHER, MARK BAUGHER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN SMITH, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Anderson and CITY OF ANDERSON
ALLEN v. THE CITY OF ANDERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
MERCEDES ALLEN
Defendant:
DETECTIVE DARRON SPARKS and THE CITY OF ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BARKDULL v. CITY OF ANDERSON et al
as 1:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
JOHN BARKDULL
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON, MATT JARRETT, SPENCER PETTIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
