Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Guillermo Reynoso et al v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Reynoso and Eleuterio Reynoso
Defendant:
City of Banning, Banning Police Department, Brandon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Megan Reeves v. Riverside County Sheriffs Department et al
as 5:2022cv02021
Plaintiff:
Megan Reeves
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Banning Police Department, Beaumont Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Megan Reeves v. City of Palm Springs et al
as 5:2022cv01910
Plaintiff:
Megan Reeves
Defendant:
City of Palm Springs, Palm Springs Police Department, Officer John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T.N.A. et al v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2020cv00604
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Aguilar, T. N. A., Linda Aguilar and others
Defendant:
City of Banning and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Valdivia et al v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2019cv01551
Defendant:
Police Chief Alex Diaz, Officer Felix, Sgt Bennet and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valdivia, E. V. and Q. V.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Hobb v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2016cv01352
Defendant:
Alex Diaz, Banning Police Department, City of Banning and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Hobb
R.R. III, et al v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2014cv01430
Defendant:
City of Banning and Does
Plaintiff:
R. R., R. R., R. R. and others
Arnulfo Zuniga v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2014cv01237
Defendant:
Banning Police Department, City of Banning, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Arnulfo Zuniga
Julia Robles v. City of Banning et al
as 5:2014cv00856
Defendant:
Ray Arretche, City of Banning, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Julia Robles
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
