Cases
Patterson v. The People Of The State Of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv01365
Defendant: Broome County Courthouse, City of Binghamton Police Department, Broome County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff: Ralph A. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. The People Of The State Of New York et al
as 6:2020cv06791
Defendant: Broome County Courthouse, City of Binghamton Police Department, Broome County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff: Ralph A. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savatxath v. City of Binghamton
as 19-64
Defendant / Appellee: Daniel J. Barta, Patrolman, Binghamton Police Department, individually and official capacities, FKA John Doe, Daniel D. Burns, Patrolman, Binghamton Police Department, Individual and Official Capacity, FKA P.O. Burns and Daniel W. Demer, Patrolman, Binghamton Police Department, Individual and Official Capacity, FKA P.O. Demar
Defendant: City of Binghamton Police Department, Chief Joseph Zikuski, Chief Binghamton Police Department, Individually and Officially Capacities and City of Binghamton
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sengmany Savatxath
Savatxath v. City of Binghamton
as 18-1252
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sengmany Savatxath
Defendant - Appellee: Daniel W. Demer, Patrolman, Binghamton Police Department, Individual and Official Capacity, FKA P.O. Demar, Daniel D. Burns, Patrolman, Binghamton Police Department, Individual and Official Capacity, FKA P.O. Burns and Daniel D. Barta, Patrolman, Binghamton Police Department, Individual and Official Capacity, FKA John Doe
Defendant: City of Binghamton, City of Binghamton Police Department and Chief Joseph Zikuski, Chief Binghamton Police Department, Individually and Officially Capacities
Ferreira v. City of Binghamton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3234
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jesus Ferreira
Defendant - Appellee: City of Binghamton and Kevin Miller, Police Officer
Defendant: City of Binghamton Police Department, Joseph Zikuski, as Police Chief of the Binghamton Police Department, John Does 1 Through 10, whose names are fictitious and identities are not currently known and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Departme
as 14-2202
Plaintiff - Appellant: Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant: Broome County Sheriff's Department, C. Peters, Investigator, individually, Freddy Askar, Investigator, Broome County Sheriff's Department, individually and others
Defendant - Appellee: J.D. Collins, Sergeant, Binghamton Police Department, individually, Charles Woody, Investigator, Binghamton Police Department, individually, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Departme
as 13-4087
Plaintiff - Appellant: Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant: Broome County Sheriff's Department, C. Peters, Investigator, individually, Freddy Askar, Investigator, Broome County Sheriff's Department, individually and others
Defendant - Appellee: New York State Police Department, J.D. Collins, Sergeant, Binghamton Police Department, individually, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Departme
as 12-2701
Plaintiff - Appellant: Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant: New York State Police Department, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellee: J.D. Collins, Sergeant, Binghamton Police Department, individually, Charles Woody, Investigator, Binghamton Police Department, individually, Jim Hawley, Investigator, Binghamton Police Department, individually and others
Heyliger v. New York State Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv01293
Plaintiff: Derek A. Heyliger
Defendant: New York State Police Department, New York State Department of Corrections Community Supervision, City of Binghamton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?