Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk et al v. City of Birmingham, Alabama
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rusk and Mary Frances Rusk
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Wendie Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Joshua Yates, Danita Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fitzpatrick v. Birmingham, City of
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Tameka Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Lietzke v. City of Birmingham et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham and Patrick D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Coke v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Markus Coke
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham Police Department and Zydeco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Turner v. City of Birmingham Police Dept
as 2:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Janisa Rosann Turner
Defendant:
City of Birmingham Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
