Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Quiroz et al v. City of Dayton et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Madelyn Marina Quiroz and Marina Naomi Hernandez Quiroz
Defendant:
Eduardo Hernandez, City of Dayton, Theo Melancon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VanDerStok et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G Andren, Tactical Machining LLC and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach and others
Petitioner:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. d/b/a 80 Percent Arms
Amicus Curiae:
Gun Owners for Safety, Jason Perry, Ryan Busse and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group Inc. doing business as 80 Percent Arms, Defense Distributed, Second Amendment Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dalwadi Hospitality Dayton LLC v. City of Dayton, Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dalwadi Hospitality Dayton LLC d/b/a Summit Inn
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Texas and Liberty County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mares et al v. City of Dayton
as 1:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Moises Mares and Maribel Trevizo
Defendant:
City of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv01764
Defendant:
Chemicals Incorporated
Plaintiff:
City of Dayton and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
City of Dayton v. Chemicals Inc.
as 4:2021cv01765
Defendant:
Chemicals Incorporated and Chemicals Inc.
Plaintiff:
City of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elbey v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Olakwesu Y. Elbey
Defendant:
State of Ohio and City of Dayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
