Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Friend v. City of Decatur Illinois, et al
as 3:2022cv03219
Plaintiff:
Charles Friend
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois, Tyler Mahan, Cody Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Macon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2019cv02191
Plaintiff:
Onesha Willingham
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Macon County Sheriff Deputies, Macon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Duffy & Associates Inc v. City of Decatur Illinois et al
as 2:2018cv02301
Plaintiff:
Duffy & Associates Inc
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois and Patrick McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Massey et al
as 2:2018cv02221
Plaintiff:
Frank Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Benjamin Massey, City of Decatur Illinois and David Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Small, Jr. v. City of Decatur, et al
as 15-3864
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN L. SMALL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DECATUR, Illinois, JAMES KNIERIM, Officer and JASON DANNER, Officer
Lee v. Owens et al
as 2:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee, III
Defendant:
James A Owens, Justin B Gray, City of Decatur Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small et al v. City of Decatur Illinois
as 2:2013cv02072
Plaintiff:
Frank L Small, Jr and Adelle D Small
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fore v. City of Decatur Illinois et al
as 2:2009cv02250
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fore
Defendant:
City of Decatur Illinois and Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
