Cases 1 - 10 of 37
The Handy Pantry et al v. The City of Hattiesburg, Misissippi
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
The Handy Pantry and Lucas Tucker
Defendant:
The City of Hattiesburg, Misissippi and The City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. The City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
William Jones, III
Defendant:
The City of Hattiesburg, Hattiesburg Police Department, Forrest County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson et al v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Toby Barker, Forrest County and others
Plaintiff:
HL&C McLeod, LLC, HL&C Forrest, LLC and Mark Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. City of Hattiesburg Police Department
as 2:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Norman Gillis McDaniel
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey et al v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
R Bro Entertainment, LLC, Hebert Taylor Ramey and Charles Bradford Ramey
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Toby Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi et al
as 2:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Larry Barnes and City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. The City of Hattiesburg
as 2:2018cv00147
Defendant:
The City of Hattiesburg
Plaintiff:
Ladreco Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Keith Lamont Lee
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg and Neil Rockhold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Hattiesburg et al
as 2:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Hattiesburg and Neal Rockhold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
