Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hamilton v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2016cv00964
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
United States Of America, State Of Texas, Harris County Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
HAMILTON, II v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TEXAS, HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Seluk, Jr., et al v. City of Houston, Texa
as 16-20002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL C. SELUK, JR. and ANDREA D. SELUK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS
Martin v. Houston Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv03461
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Martin, Sr.
Defendant:
Houston Police Department, Harris County Sheriff's Department, The City of Houston, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis Wiley v. Devon Anderson, et al
as 15-20412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIS FLOYD WILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEVON ANDERSON, District Attorney, City of Houston, Harris County, Texas, ART BAUEREISS, District Attorney, City of Lufkin, Texas, LOU CLOY, District Attorney, City of Woodville, County of Tyler, Texas and others
Watson v. City of Houston, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv01300
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Watson
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas and John Doe Houston Police Officers 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seluk et al v. City of Houston, Texas
as 4:2015cv00838
Plaintiff:
Daniel C Seluk, Jr and Andrea D Seluk
Defendant:
City of Houston, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
