Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Lillie Middlebrooks v. City of Macon - Bibb County Georgia, et al
as 24-10705
Plaintiff:
LILLIE M. MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON - BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, ERICA L. WOODFORD, TAMIKA BURNETT and others
BIVINS v. CITY OF MACON GA et al
as 5:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN CURTIS BIVINS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON GA, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY JEREMIAH MONEY PENNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLEBROOKS v. CITY OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
LILLIE M MIDDLEBROOKS
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA, ERICA L WOODFORD, TAMIKA BURNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hill v. May et al
as 3:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bernard Hill
Defendant:
Bobby May, Douglas Triplett and City of Macon, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. The City of Macon et al
as 3:2019cv00066
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, The City of Macon and Buzz McGuire
Plaintiff:
Lucious Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demetrice Martin v. City of Macon Georgia, et al
as 16-16103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRICE MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MACON GEORGIA, OVERLOOK GARDENS PROPERTIES LLC, THE WOODRUFF COMPANIES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
FLEWELLEN v. MACON BIBB GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
SHAWN FLEWELLEN
Defendant:
MACON BIBB GEORGIA, CITY OF MACON, MIKE BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
