Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Mosgrove v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Tom Mosgrove
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, City of Morgan Hill, Scott Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gary Easley v. Donald Trump, et al
as 23-15408
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JOSEPH R BIDEN, President, LUCY H. KOH, Judge and others
Easley v. Trump et al
as 5:2022cv02344
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Joseph Biden, Lucy Koh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv08962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Saldate v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 5:2021cv08226
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Saldate
Defendant:
City of Morgan Hill, Kira Sareli, Tony Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Easley v. State of California, et al
as 21-15702
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, County of Santa Clara, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Easley v. State of California, et al
as 5:2021cv00893
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Company, Donald Trump, Katarina Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gary Easley v. City of Morgan Hill, et al
as 19-16192
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURIE SMITH, City Director of Police Department, FIERRO, Morgan Hill Police Deputy, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY D. EASLEY
Easley v. City of Morgan Hill et al
as 5:2018cv04241
Defendant:
Madison Glover, Roland Burney, Santa Clara Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Gary D Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv06562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
