Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Valentine-Williams v. City of Omaha, Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
LaWanda J. Valentine-Williams
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska and Jane and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Belcastro Gonzalez v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Katherine Belcastro Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Omaha and Todd Schmaderer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jurgens v. City of Omaha
as 8:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Linda Jurgens
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stark v. City of Omaha, Nebraska et al
as 4:2023cv03242
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Stark
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Nebraska, Todd Schmaderer, Nicolas Yanez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. City of Omaha
as 8:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II
Defendant:
City of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kimbril v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kimbril
Defendant:
City of Omaha and Christopher Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parato v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Angela Parato
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Jean Stothert, Todd Schmaderer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vore v. Girls Incorporated of Omaha et al
as 8:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Michael Vore
Defendant:
Girls Incorporated of Omaha, City of Omaha and CorVel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
