Cases 11 - 20 of 64
NEW SOUTH MEDIA GROUP LLC v. CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA
as 4:2021cv00159
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
New South Media Group, LLC and NEW SOUTH MEDIA GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Bangert et al
as 3:2021cv03081
Defendant:
Paul Hodges, Kevin Pavon, Kin Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. City of Quincy et al
as 3:2021cv03043
Defendant:
Quincy, City of, Adams County Jail, Gary Farha and others
Plaintiff:
Abriece Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Lovelace, et al v. Adam Gibson, et al
as 20-3254
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF QUINCY, ADAM GIBSON, Detective, JOHN SUMMERS, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINCOLN LOVELACE, LOGAN LOVELACE, CHRISTINE LOVELACE, on behalf of her minor son, Larson Lovelace and others
BAROODY et al v. CITY OF QUINCY FLORIDA et al
as 4:2020cv00217
Plaintiff:
JULIE BAROODY and WILLIAM FARMER
Defendant:
KEITH DOWDELL, RONTE HARRIS, ANGELA SAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC v. Town of Weymouth
as 1:2019cv12338
Defendant:
Priya Howell, Frank Singleton, Patrick O'Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States v. City of Quincy, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv10483
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
City of Quincy, Massachusetts
3Rd Party Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
HENSON v. CITY OF QUINCY
as 4:2019cv00071
Defendant:
CITY OF QUINCY, JOSHUA ARMSTRONG and MICHAEL COPELAND
Plaintiff:
TORRANCE HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
