Cases 21 - 30 of 64
City of Quincy v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2019op45008
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Quincy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Quincy v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 1:2018cv12627
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Quincy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Smith v. City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03289
Plaintiff:
Shannon Smith
Defendant:
The City of Quincy , Officer Travis Wiemelt , Mercantile Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. The City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03147
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Newman
Defendant:
The City of Quincy, Robert Copley, Kyle Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fore River Residents Against, et al v. FERC
as 17-1139
Petitioner:
Fore River Residents Against the Compressor Station, Food & Water Watch, City of Quincy, Massachusetts and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Lovelace et al v. Gibson et al
as 1:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lovelace , Logan Lovelace , Lincoln Lovelace and others
Defendant:
Adam Gibson, Robert Copley, John Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-35067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Jones v. Keith Dowdell, et al
as 16-12316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD DAVID JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH DOWDELL, Commissioner District One, CLEMEY, Customer Service Director, City of Quincy, JACK MCLEAN, City Manager, City of Quincy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
