Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Weirton Area Water Board et al v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Deepwater Chemicals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Weirton Area Water Board and City of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Popish et al
as 5:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Eric Popish and City Of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colvin v. Redish et al
as 5:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Joshua Edward Colvin
Defendant:
Eric Redish and City Of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Borham et al v. Popish et al
as 5:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gary Clyde Borham, Gary Clyde Borham, Gary Clyde Borham and others
Defendant:
Eric Popish, Rodney Patterson, Rick Scheetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Susko v. City Of Weirton et al
as 5:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Susko
Defendant:
City Of Weirton, Mark Harris, William Miller and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arango et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2007mc00007
Plaintiff:
Robert Arango and Cindy Arango
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Veritrans Specialty Vehicles, Inc., City of Weirton and others
Taylor et al v. City of Weirton
as 5:2007cv00013
Plaintiff:
Charles Taylor and Kathleen Grossi
Defendant:
City of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowers et al v. Popish et al
as 5:2007cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mark Bowers, Kimberly Bowers and Kevin Bowers, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Popish and City Of Weirton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
