Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wade v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Ronald G Wade, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baldwin v. SSI Satellite Sericer Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
SSI Satellite Sericer Inc, FNU Morgan, FNU Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. Satellite Sericer, et al
as 23-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY RAY BALDWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SATELLITE SERICER INC., DEPUTY MORGAN, DETENTION OFFICER CARTER and others
Baldwin v. Satellite Sericer INC et al
as 5:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Satellite Sericer INC, Ms FNU Morgan, Mr FNU Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant:
John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 5:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Rich Fitzgerald, Harper, Landya McCafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. Woodward, et al
as 14-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, EILEEN J. O'CONNOR, DAVID E. O'MEILIA and others
Springer v. Woodward, et al
as 14-5063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SCOTT WOODWARD, EILEEN J. O'CONNOR, DAVID E. O'MEILIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
