Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Clapp v. Tobin, et al
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN S. CLAPP
Defendant:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, Norfolk County District Attorney, RICHARD D. MCKEON, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER BRUCE TOBIN, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, TROOPER SCOTT KEARNS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, SGT. BRIAN BROOKS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Clapp v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv10426
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Clapp
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Michael W. Morrissey, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Securities and Exchange Commission v. McPhail et al
as 1:2014cv12958
Defendant:
Eric j McPhail, Douglas A Parigian , John j Gilmartin and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Maloney v. Aponte et al
as 3:2014cv30054
Plaintiff:
Owen D Maloney
Defendant:
Ronald E Aponte , Town of Belchertown, The , Board of Trustees of Clapp Memorial Library and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Puccelli et al v. Pinchot
as 1:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Caryl M. Clapp and Janet K. Puccelli
Defendant:
Oliver S. Pinchot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Clapp v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2011cv10345
Plaintiff:
Thomas W Clapp
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Paul W. Sullivan Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Milward, et al v. Acuity Specialty Products, et al
as 09-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN K. MILWARD and LINDA J. MILWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., AGS COMPANY, ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
BOSTICK, INC., LA-CO INDUSTRIES, INC./MARKAL, LPS INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Movant:
COUNCIL FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH ON TOXICS, NACHMAN BRAUTBAR, DAVID C. CHRISTIANI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
