Cases 11 - 20 of 42
LAMASTER et al v. STIGDON et al
as 4:2018cv00029
Defendant:
ALLISON BERRY, JOAN KELLY, THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
A. G.A. L., E. M. L., GREGORY A. LAMASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Claudia Zvunca v. Tiberiu Klein
as 17-2829
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ESTATE OF CLAUDIA ZVUNCA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIBERIU KLEIN
Zvunca v. Greyhound Lines Inc et al
as 1:2017cv05395
Plaintiff:
Claudia Zvunca
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc, Motor Coach Industries Inc. and Tiberiu Klein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Claudia Manley, et al v. Bruce Law, et al
as 16-3846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDIA MANLEY and NOEL MANLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE LAW, Doctor and HINSDALE TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL, DISTRICT 86
Manley et al v. Law et al
as 1:2015cv07499
Plaintiff:
Claudia Manley and Noel Manley
Defendant:
Bruce Law and Hinsdale Township High School District 86
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaseemuddin v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2014cv02995
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Vaseemuddin
Defendant:
County of Cook, Dana Quartana , Union Doctors Council SEIU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THORN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE et al
as 1:2014cv00358
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALLEY, CEO, FIRST CLASS TAX RELIEF, CEO, NATIONAL TAX COMPANY (New York, NY) and others
Plaintiff:
COLOSSUS MGT. TRUST and MICHAEL R. THORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
