Cases 1 - 10 of 37
New v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Tyler Dwayne New
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Cleveland-Cliffs Princeton Coal, Inc., Twin State Mining, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cleveland v. Jividen et al
as 2:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Hason Cleveland
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames, Joshua Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kilgore-Bey v. Sawyer et al
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
D. Kemper, Kelly Moore, Jessica Houchin and others
Plaintiff:
Minister-Cleveland Winston Kilgore-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kilgore-Bey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
Minister Cleveland Winston Kilgore-Bey
Defendant:
Warden R. Hudgins and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. Bankson et al
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Bankson and Spanks
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Thor Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kilgore-Bey v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv00197
Respondent:
Willaim Barr and Warden Huggins
Petitioner:
Minister Cleveland Winston Kilgore-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kilgore-Bey v. United States Attorney General William Barr
as 5:2019cv00309
Petitioner:
Minister-Cleveland Winston Kilgore-Bey
Respondent:
United States Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cleveland v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00736
Plaintiff:
Hason Cleveland
Defendant:
Sheryl Snider, Cheryl Chandler, Administrative Segregation Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Doe et al
as 5:2019cv00267
Defendant:
John Doe and Mary Jane
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Thor Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
