Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr. v. Leigh Gwathney, et al
as 22-11775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACK AUTHER FOREMAN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEIGH GWATHNEY, DWAYNE SPURLOCK and CLIFF WALKER
Foreman v. Gwathney et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 2:2021cv00675
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock and Cliff Walker
Consolidated Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Gwathney et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER CASE)
as 2:2021cv00804
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Spurlock et al
as 2:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Albert D Young
Defendant:
Dewayne Spurlock, Cliff Walker, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanon v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00737
Plaintiff:
Terry James Buchanon, II
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles, Lynn Head, Sarah C. Still and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foreman v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2021cv01353
Plaintiff:
Mack Auther Foreman, Jr
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mack Arthur Foreman, Jr and Mack Auther Foreman, Jr
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock and Cliff Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
