Cases 51 - 60 of 130
Clifford v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
Virginia Clifford
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bargeloh et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Greta Bargeloh and Clifford Bargeloh
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31521
Plaintiff:
Dana Clark and Clifford E. Clark
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv30453
Plaintiff:
Kristin Tavernier Foley and Clifford J. Foley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren vet al . Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29462
Plaintiff:
Margaret E. Warren and Clifford J. Warren, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Artis et al v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 7:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Ben Artis , Diane Artis , Annie Jacobs and others
Defendant:
Murphy-Brown, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dockstader et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv26713
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Dockstader and Clifford Young
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiley et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv26627
Plaintiff:
Beth Wiley and Clifford Wiley
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clifford v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv25642
Plaintiff:
Barbara Clifford
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02615
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Anderson
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Clifford Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
