Cases 61 - 70 of 100
William Carlisle v. Clifford Dunn
as 13-10401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM JEFFERY CARLISLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFFORD DUNN, Doctor
Texas Skyline, Limited, et al v. Clifford Woerner
as 13-50113
Debtor:
In the Matter of: CLIFFORD J. WOERNER and GAIL S. WOERNER
Appellant:
TEXAS SKYLINE, LIMITED, PECOS & 15TH, LIMITED and SKYLINE INTERESTS, L.L.C.
Appellee:
CLIFFORD J. WOERNER, individually, doing business as Woerner Interests
Barron & Newburger, P.C. v. Texas Skyline, Limited, et al
as 13-50075
Debtor:
In the Matter of: CLIFFORD J. WOERNER and GAIL S. WOERNER
Appellant:
BARRON & NEWBURGER, P.C.
Appellee:
TEXAS SKYLINE, LIMITED, PECOS & 15TH, LIMITED, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE and others
Clifford Latham v. Matthew Faulkner, et al
as 12-31008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLIFFORD D. LATHAM
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW FAULKNER, individual and in his official capacity, K JOHNSON, individual and in his official capacity, OFFICER CROOK, individual and in his official capacity and others
USA v. Morgan Wood
as 12-10615
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MORGAN CLIFFORD WOOD, also known as Roca Mick
Bruce Fulmer v. Scott Klein, et al
as 12-10416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY KOPP, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT W. KLEIN, DONALD B. REED, STEPHEN L. ROBERTSON and others
USA v. Jimmie Richardson
as 12-10359
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JIMMIE CLIFFORD RICHARDSON
Target Strike Incorporated v. Marston & Marston, Inc., et al
as 12-50221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARGET STRIKE INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSTON & MARSTON, INCORPORATED, MARSTON ENVIRONMENTAL, INCORPORATED, CLIFFORD R. WILLIAMS, "Kip" and others
Sylvester Martin v. Ronnie Seal, et al
as 12-30143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SYLVESTER MARTIN
Defendant - Appellant:
RONNIE SEAL, Lieutenant, DAVID ALFORD, Sergeant, CLIFFORD TURNER, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
