Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Kaminski et al v. Coulter et al
as 2:2015cv12810
Plaintiff:
Cheryl N. Kaminski , Lincoln Park Police and Fire Retirees Association, Inc. , Michael J. Moulios and others
Defendant:
Brad L. Coulter , R. Kevin Clinton, Thomas E. Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portillo-Dowdy et al v. Riverview, City of et al
as 2:2014cv12469
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Portillo-Dowdy and Malhia Rehman
Defendant:
Riverview, City of , Clifford Rosenbohm , Michael P. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joy v. Georgia et al
as 2:2012cv12971
Plaintiff:
Clifford Jason Joy
Defendant:
Georgia, Eash, Wesch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Hillsdale County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2012cv00523
Defendant:
Eric Holder, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Charles Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. Gorzewlewski
as 5:2011cv12296
Plaintiff:
Clifford Johnson
Defendant:
Kinga Gorzewlewski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horrigan v. Haworth et al
as 1:2010cv00462
Plaintiff:
Thomas Patrick Horrigan
Defendant:
Lee L. Haworth, Diana Moreland, Nancy K. Donnellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Dice Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv11465
Plaintiff:
Michael J Simpson
Defendant:
Dice Corporation and Clifford V. Dice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wellwood v. Rosebohm et al
as 2:2009cv13647
Plaintiff:
Michael Wellwood
Defendant:
Clifford Rosebohm, Rosanne Wooliver, Richard Troup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv11257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
