Cases 41 - 50 of 112
KAROLSKI v. BEAVER COUNTY JAIL/PRISON
as 2:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD J. KAROLSKI
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY JAIL/PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALCOMB v. BEAVER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA (PROTHONATARY) et al
as 2:2013cv01772
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA (PROTHONATARY), PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS (CENTRAL OFFICE), PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv07107
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD BROWN, III
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLIFFORD, JR. v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2013cv06659
Petitioner:
RANSOM CLIFFORD, JR.
Respondent:
KERESTES, PA. BOARD OF PROBATION PAROLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Clifford Fake
as 13-3643
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFFORD E. FAKE
USA v. Clifford White
as 13-3057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFFORD WHITE
Clifford Murray v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 13-2463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
MOORE v. C.F.C.F. PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv02493
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD THEODORE MOORE
Defendant:
C.F.C.F. PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. MEISEL et al
as 5:2013cv02157
Plaintiff:
MARC ANTHONY JAMES ARNOLD
Defendant:
DALE MEISEL, EDWARD SWEENEY, CINDY EQIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2013cv00427
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WILSON
Respondent:
DEPT. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ORLANDO HARPER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
