Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Tyler v. Gant et al
as 8:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
Randall Tyler
Defendant:
Doris Gant , Clifford Killingbeck, D Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. USA
as 8:2010cv70245
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Justin Clifford Gamble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Baker v. Cartledge
as 6:2010cv00298
Petitioner:
Clifford M Baker
Respondent:
Leroy Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YAMA SEAFOOD, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT GROUP, INC. et al
as 6:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
YAMA SEAFOOD, INC.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL PAYMENT GROUP, INC., CLIFFORD J. BURGESS, CLIFFORD J. BURGESS and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bates et al v. Beaufort County Board of Elections and Voter Registration South Carolina et al
as 9:2008cv03583
Plaintiff:
Randy Bates and Joan Bryan
Defendant:
Beaufort County Board of Elections and Voter Registration South Carolina, Marilyn Caprielian, Ellen Bray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. Ozmint
as 3:2008cv02794
Plaintiff:
Clifford Thompson
Respondent:
Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Canty v. Canty et al
as 0:2008cv02579
Plaintiff:
Clifford T Canty and Cynthia D Canty
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Anderson et al v. Duke Manufacturing Company Inc
as 3:2008cv02293
Plaintiff:
Viola Anderson, Leah Bonneville, Clifford Byrd and others
Defendant:
Duke Manufacturing Company Inc and Duke Manufacturing Company Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Riches v Stoll
as 6:2008cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Henry Alfred Kissinger, Randall David Fischer and others
Defendant:
Clifford Stoll and Matthew R Schuster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
