Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 111
DAKER v. WARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant: CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff: WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THRASHER v. PERRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00172
Defendant: MS ROSS, TIMOTHY WARD, JACKSON and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT THRASHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant: JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thrasher v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv00044
Defendant: Lt. Ross, Commissioner Timothy Ward, Warden Clinton Perry and others
Plaintiff: Robert Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Perry
as 2:2020cv00089
Respondent: Warden Clinton Perry
Petitioner: Marshall Allen Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SWINT v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00117
Defendant: OFFICER FREEMAN, TIM WARD, CLINTON PERRY and others
Plaintiff: JOSEPH SWINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swint et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv01256
Plaintiff: Joseph Swint
Defendant: Lt. Walling, Tim Ward, Clinton Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery Bradford v. Clinton Perry
as 20-10971
Petitioner / Appellant: AVERY BRADFORD
Respondent / Appellee: CLINTON PERRY
EVANS v. PERRY et al
as 5:2020cv00075
Plaintiff: RANDLE EVANS
Defendant: LIEUTENANT TANYA STATEN, WARDEN CLINTON PERRY and CO II LACHASITY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00486
Defendant: DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, SEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Plaintiff: DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?