Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Lakin v. City of Clovis et al
as 2:2014cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lakin
Defendant:
City of Clovis , Clovis Police Department and Adriana Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James v. City of Clovis Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
Darren L James
Defendant:
City of Clovis Police Department, Louis Riddle and Roman Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Cain A. Gonzales
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Clovis Police Department and Janet Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. City of Clovis et al.,
as 1:2011cv00810
Plaintiff:
Dewey Rush
Defendant:
City of Clovis , Clovis Police Department , William Manzor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hill v. Clovis Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv01391
Plaintiff:
Preston Hill
Defendant:
Clovis Police Department, Mark Bradford, Office of the District Attorney Fresno County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Ricks v. New Mexico Adult Probation and Parole Department et al
as 1:2011cv00608
Plaintiff:
Luvell Ricks
Defendant:
New Mexico Adult Probation and Parole Department , Elizabeth Queener , Kristy Muller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilpin v. Roosevelt County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
Joy Gilpin
Defendant:
Clovis Police Department , City of Clovis , Shawn Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Tater-Alexander v. County of Fresno, et al
as 11-15659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TATER-ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF FRESNO, COMMUNITY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, CITY OF CLOVIS and others
Lunsford v. Howard et al
as 2:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
Cody Lunsford
Defendant:
Jon M Howard and Clovis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunsford v. Howard et al
as 1:2011cv00169
Plaintiff:
Cody Lunsford
Defendant:
Jon M Howard and Clovis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
