Cases 11 - 20 of 51
KELLEY v. HUYVARET et al
as 3:2021cv00095
Defendant:
CHARLES WHALLON, DOUG HUYVARET, JACK ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
CLYDE N. KELLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. WOODLAND et al
as 3:2021cv00091
Defendant:
OFFICER MICHELLE WOODLAND, CAPTAIN AMMON and DIANE PFEIFFER
Plaintiff:
CLYDE N. KELLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. MOGAN et al
as 3:2021cv00092
Defendant:
OFFICER MOGAN and SGT. NEIVES
Plaintiff:
CLYDE N. KELLEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv03231
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01987
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CLYDE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERMI LLC v. PEACH
as 1:2019cv04628
Defendant:
CLYDE PEACH, JR. and CLYDE PEACH, JR. doing business as INDIANA BRACE CO INC. doing business as CLYDE PEACH LLC doing business as PEACH MEDICAL LLC
Plaintiff:
ERMI LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ROEBUCK et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02845
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CLYDE HOY ROEBUCK, RACHEL J ROEBUCK and RACHEL J. ROEBUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Sheriff
as 1:2018cv00015
Petitioner:
Clyde E Williams, Jr
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SJOERDMSA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03647
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CLYDE SJOERDMSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ERVIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03606
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CLYDE ERVIN, JR.
Unknown:
Brian S. Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
