Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Diffee v. Lone Oak Holdings, LLC
as 1:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Clyde James Diffee, II
Defendant:
Lone Oak Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Baine v. Weaver et al
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Jason Baine
Defendant:
Clyde Weaver, Steven Whitlock and Decatur County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver et al v. Decatur County Government et al
as 1:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Clyde Weaver and Tyler Lindsay
Defendant:
Decatur County Government and Decatur County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Edwards-Bradford v. Guzman et al
as 2:2019cv02877
Defendant:
Clyde Dismuke, Tina Almond and Sherri Guzman
Plaintiff:
Patrece R. Edwards-Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robinson v. Methodist Healthcare et al
as 2:2018cv02481
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
University of Tenn., Clyde Jones, Regional One Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atkins v. Town of Gibson, Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
Taylor Atkins
Defendant:
Town of Gibson, Tennessee , Tony Black , Charles Summer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dear v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02391
Movant:
Clyde Dear
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beard v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv02262
Plaintiff:
James H. Beard, Jr.
Defendant:
LoAmma Smith, Helen Johnson, Ozata Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02438
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC , U.S. Bank National Association and Weiss Spicer Cash, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Clyde Harden and Emmie Harden
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
