Cases 1 - 10 of 12
City of Boston, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-72749
Petitioner:
CITY OF PIEDMONT, California, HOWARD COUNTY, Maryland, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, Maryland and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1301
Petitioner:
City of Piedmont, California, Howard County, Maryland, City of Gaithersburg, Maryland and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Anne Arundel County, MD, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-4165
Petitioner:
CITY OF YUMA, AZ, CITY OF BELLEVUE, WA, CITY OF WILMINGTON, DE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Not Yet Classified:
NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVSION ASSOCIATION
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-72760
Petitioner:
LAREDO, TEXAS, CHEVY CHASE VILLAGE, MARYLAND, WILMINGTON, DELAWARE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
City of Austin, Texas, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70341
Intervenor:
CITY OF MEDINA, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LACEY, WASHINGTON, CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner:
CITY OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, CITY OF GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Bellevue, Washington v. City of Burlingame, California
as 15-1284
Petitioner:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF MCALLEN, TEXAS and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al v. Paul Hudson, et al
as 12-50496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIME WARNER CABLE and TEXAS CABLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL HUDSON, In His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, JULIE PARSLEY, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and BARRY SMITHERMAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES FOR UTILITY ISSUES, GTE SOUTHWEST INC, doing business as Verizon Southwest, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, doing business as SBC Texas and others
Texas Cable & Telecom Assn, et al v. Rick Perry, et al
as 10-51113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIME WARNER CABLE and TEXAS CABLE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL HUDSON, JULIE PARSLEY, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and BARRY SMITHERMAN, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS COALITION OF CITIES FOR UTILITY ISSUES, GTE SOUTHWEST INC, doing business as Verizon Southwest, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, doing business as SBC Texas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
