Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Ellison v. Coffield Unit
as 3:2022cv01513
Plaintiff:
Rickey Ellison
Defendant:
Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 4:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit, TDCJ, Warden Garcis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. H.H. Coffield Unit
as 4:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Eric Jackson
Defendant:
H.H. Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott v. Johnson
as 22-40255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant / Appellee:
K. Johnson, Kitchen Manager, Gurney Unit, Tony A. Dean, Officer, Coffield Unit, Stuart Calhoun, Warden, Gurney Unit and others
Denby v. Garcia
as 22-40189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donis Lemond Denby
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Garcia, Senior Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit, FNU Delapp, Associate Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit, FNU Lane, Assistant Warden TDCJ Coffield Unit and others
Green v. Lumpkin
as 22-40148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Louis Ray Green
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Kenneth M. Putnam, Warden, Coffield Unit, Pamela Pace, University of Texas Medical Branch Medical Care Pracitce Manager, Coffield Unit and others
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 6:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit and Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Coffield Unit et al
as 9:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
David Jackson
Defendant:
Coffield Unit and Ellis Unit Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Coffield Unit
as 3:2021cv00420
Plaintiff:
Patrick Gene Russell
Defendant:
Coffield Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Coffield Unit
as 6:2020cv00489
Defendant:
Coffield Unit
Plaintiff:
Dexter Sturgeon, Jr
Consolidated Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
