Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Brown v. Hall, et al
as 11-1799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL FERRARA, PHIL ROBERTS, in his individual and official capacity as Rockport Town Manager, JEFF NIMS, in his individual and official capacity as Zoning Officer for the Town of Camden and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. BAIUNGO, TOWN OF CAMDEN, ROCKPORT, ME and others
Brown v. Baiungo, et al
as 11-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL FERRARA, PHIL ROBERTS, in his individual and official capacity as Rockport Town Manager, JEFF NIMS, in his individual and official capacity as Zoning Officer for the Town of Camden and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. BAIUNGO, TOWN OF CAMDEN, ROCKPORT, ME and others
Brown v. Roberts, et al
as 11-1800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL FERRARA, PHIL ROBERTS, in his individual and official capacity as Rockport Town Manager, JEFF NIMS, in his individual and official capacity as Zoning Officer for the Town of Camden and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. BAIUNGO, TOWN OF CAMDEN, ROCKPORT, ME and others
WHITE v. SWARTZ et al
as 2:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
DONALD WHITE, I
Defendant:
BARBARA SWARTZ, HANNA MONACO, GORDON WERTHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. FERRARA et al
as 2:2010cv00523
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL FERRARA, JOSEPH BAIUNGA , CAMDEN, TOWN OF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffin v. Fessenden
as 10-9008
Appellee:
SCOTT W. COFFIN
Creditor:
ECAST SETTLEMENT CORPORATION
Appellant:
PETER C. FESSENDEN, Chapter 13 Trustee
COFFIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
JEAN COFFIN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JOHNSON v. CITY OF GORHAM et al
as 2:2007cv00188
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL COFFIN , DEAN HANNON , MICHAEL NAULT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
