Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cogent, Inc. v. Myers
as 5:2024cv06041
Plaintiff:
Cogent, Inc. doing business as Cogent Companies
Defendant:
Adam Kurt Myers
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Cogent, Inc. v. Swan et al
as 5:2021cv06125
Plaintiff:
Cogent, Inc. doing business as Cogent Companies
Defendant:
Gann Swan and DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
DXP Enterprises, Inc. v. Cogent, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03471
Plaintiff:
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Tim Hill, Brian Wookey and Cogent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wookey et al v. DXP Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02542
Plaintiff:
Brian Wookey , Tim Hill and Cogent, Inc.
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blue Spike, LLC v. 3M Cogent, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06067
Defendant:
3M Cogent, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Spike, LLC
Unknown:
Stephen Edwards, Eric M Albritton and Michael A Benefield
Blue Spike, LLC v. 3M Cogent, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00685
Plaintiff:
Blue Spike, LLC
Defendant:
3M Cogent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Blue Spike, LLC v. Texas Instruments, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00499
Consolidated Defendant:
Precise Biometrics AB, Sonda Technologies, Ltd., Technicolor USA, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Soundcloud Ltd., TuneSat, LLC, Zeitera, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
David Folsom and Scott Woloson
Counter Defendant:
L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc., Scott A. Moskowitz and Blue Spike, Inc.
Defendant:
Ensequence, Inc. and Anviz Global, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Spike, LLC
Special Master:
Francis McGovern
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Mary Shanahan v. Cogent Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06911
Defendant:
3M Company, John C. Bolger, Cogent Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Shanahan
Cogent Inc v. UPEK Inc
as 2:2007cv01562
Plaintiff:
Cogent Inc and Cogent Inc
Defendant:
UPEK Inc
Counter Claimant:
UPEK Inc
Counter Defendant:
Cogent Inc and Cogent Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
