Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Lyons Partnership, L.P. et al v. New York's Unique Entertainment Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv03319
Plaintiff:
Lyons Partnership, L.P., Hit Entertainment, Inc., Gullane (Delaware) LLC and others
Defendant:
New York's Unique Entertainment Corp., William Peterson, American Dance & Drama Studio Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Capitol Records, LLC v. City Hall Records, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv06488
Plaintiff:
Capitol Records, LLC
Defendant:
City Hall Records, Inc. and Robin Cohn
3Rd Party Defendant:
Avid, Ltd., Body & Soul, Comet Records and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Watkins et al v. Kajima International Incorporated et al
as 3:2007cv00423
Defendant:
Richard A. Belotti, California, State of, John Vega and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Watkins and Michael D. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dennis Publishing, Inc. v. L&G, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00590
Plaintiff:
Dennis Publishing, Inc.
Defendant:
L&G, Inc. and Gary S. Cohn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Michael W Watkins et al v. Ronald M George et al
as 5:2005cv01036
Defendant:
John Vega, Sherry A Thompson, James F Ahern and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W Watkins and Michael D Watkins
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Venture Catalyst v. Tech Results Inc, et al
as 3:2005cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ventrue Catalyst, Inc
Defendant:
Tech Results, Inc., TRMP LLC, Cohn Tehcnologies, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Jeff Cohn
Counter Defendant:
Javier Saenz, Greg Shay and Kevin McIntosh
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
IPXL Holdings, LLC, et al v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 1:2004cv00070
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Mintz Levin Cohn, Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, P.C.
Plaintiff:
IPXL Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
