Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roanne Eye v. Cohn et al
as 0:2011cv61584
Plaintiff:
Roanne Eye
Defendant:
James I. Cohn, Robin S Rosenbaum, Lurana S. Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbieri v. Kelley et al
as 0:2011cv60800
Plaintiff:
Frank Barbieri
Defendant:
Kyle H Kelley , Kelley, Goldberg, Leach & Cohn, P.C. and CCIP Orlando, Ltd, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv81149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010bk00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Aiken v. Armstrong et al
as 3:2009cv01274
Plaintiff:
Warren Aiken, Jr.
Defendant:
Armstrong, United States District Court to Civil Rights Remedie, Michael A. Shortsein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aiken v. Segade et al
as 3:2009cv00993
Plaintiff:
Warren Aiken, Sr.
Defendant:
Segade, James L. Cohn, Justin Grosz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aiken v. Corrigan et al
as 3:2009cv00851
Plaintiff:
Warren Aiken, Sr.
Defendant:
Timothy Corrigan, Mr. Norris, James I. Cohn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ader Properties Okeechobee Blvd LLC v. Cohn
as 1:2009cv22163
Plaintiff:
Ader Properties Okeechobee Blvd LLC and Ader Properties Okeechobee Blvd LLC
Defendant:
Alan Cohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Shorstein et al v. Aiken et al
as 3:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Shorstein, Warren Aiken, Sr. and James I. Cohn
Defendant:
C. M. Jackson, S. Sike, Michael Allen Shorstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
