Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Staab v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv01592
Plaintiff:
Maranie Staab
Defendant:
City of Portland, Colby Marrs, Justin Damerville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aplin v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
B. Smith, Dewald, Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aplin et al v. Oregon State Hospital
as 6:2020cv02178
Plaintiff:
Jim Warberg, Colby Aplin and Robin Vickio
Defendant:
Oregon State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aplin v. Fraiser
as 3:2020cv01359
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Defendant:
Fraiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. 1450 SE Orient, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
Denise K. Concannon, Michael R. Munzing, Aligra Marie Rainy and others
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aplin v. Garrick et al
as 3:2018cv01124
Defendant:
Mark Swanson, Mr. Blaska, Nora Mains and others
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colby, D.D.S. et al v. InterDent Service Corporation
as 6:2018cv00781
Plaintiff:
OCD Investments, LLC, Leigh Colby, D.D.S. and Oregon Dental, P.C.
Defendant:
InterDent Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ramos v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail
as 3:2018cv00434
Defendant:
Multnomah County Inverness Jail
Plaintiff:
Colby Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramos v. State of Oregon
as 3:2018cv00339
Petitioner:
Colby Ramos
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aplin v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail et al
as 3:2017cv02061
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
Larissa Danilevski, Andrew Freitas, James MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
