Cases 31 - 40 of 318
COLON v. MASON et al
as 5:2022cv00596
Petitioner:
WILBERT COLON
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
TAMMY SMITH, GAYLORD STAUFFER, RONDA LOCKETT and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE (AMERICA) INC. and GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv05608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Colon-Espada v. Warden of Cumberland County Prison
as 2:2021cv05161
Petitioner:
Jose Colon-Espada
Respondent:
Warden of Cumberland County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Colon-Espada v. Warden of Cumberland County Prison
as 1:2021cv01964
Petitioner:
Jose Colon-Espada
Respondent:
Warden of Cumberland County Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CASSESE v. STOCKER et al
as 2:2021cv04972
Plaintiff:
JULISSA CASSESE
Defendant:
LESTER STOCKER and CARLEY T COLON
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
COLON v. RIVELLO et al
as 2:2021cv04486
Petitioner:
Mr. WILLIAM COLON
Respondent:
Superintendent JOHN RIVELLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OZRAIL v. MARTINEZ-COLON et al
as 5:2021cv03443
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED OZRAIL
Defendant:
JOSE MARTINEZ-COLON, MILLER DEDICATED SERVICES LLC, MILLER AUTO LEASING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLON v. KINNEL et al
as 5:2021cv03337
Plaintiff:
RAMONA COLON
Defendant:
OFFICER AARON EUGENE KINNEL, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOES, OFFICERS JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
