Cases 51 - 60 of 577
Harrison v. Commissioner, SSA
as 22-4108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JILL A. HARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SSA
King v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Genevieve King
Defendant:
Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bethke v. Commissioner, SSA
as 22-4101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA BETHKE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Dennis v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
James Dennis
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Gilbert v. Commissioner, SSA
as 22-3207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Avant v. Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA
as 8:2022cv02403
Plaintiff:
Michele Avant
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Wiswall v. Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA
as 8:2022cv02289
Plaintiff:
Shannon Nichole Wiswall
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stallings v. Commissioner, SSA
as 4:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Stallings
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Thornhill v. Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA
as 8:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Tracy Thornhill
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Commissioner SSA
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Commissioner, SSA
as 22-6158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIANNA THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
