Cases 31 - 40 of 65
CLAYTON v. EDWARD et al
as 5:2021cv00081
Defendant:
CO2 FLOYD EDWARD, CO2 ERIKA SHINHOLSTER, REGENIA WOMBLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDLEY JR v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00064
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD and WARDEN KARL FORT
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LARRY RIDLEY JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WARDEN TED HILBIN, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CLAYTON v. WARD et al
as 1:2021cv00025
Defendant:
SGT TONY WARD, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, HEAD WARDEN WILLIAM STEEDLEY and others
Plaintiff:
LANTARIO LATRAVIAN CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLERBEE v. WARD et al
as 5:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
WILBERT ELLERBEE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILCOX STATE PRISON and WARDEN ARTIS SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmichael v. Berry et al
as 3:2020cv00172
Respondent:
Vance Laughlin, Walter Berry and Commissioner Timothy C. Ward
Petitioner:
Charles Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WRIGHT v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00332
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ALL COMMISSIONER DESIGNEES
Plaintiff:
WILLIE FRANK WRIGHT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAYTON v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2020cv00270
Defendant:
CONLEY, SIKES, CHIEF COUNSELOR WIPPLE and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv02846
Defendant:
Corr. Commissioner Timothy C. Ward and Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jamon Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WHITE et al
as 5:2020cv00260
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN JERMAINE WHITE and COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
