Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Malave-Toro v. PR National Parks Company et al
as 3:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Myriam Malave-Toro
Defendant:
PR National Parks Company, PR Sports and Recreation Department, Municipality of San Juan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mandry v. Mandry-Mercado et al
as 3:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
Salvador Mandry
Defendant:
Javier E. Mandry-Mercado and Commonwealth of PR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz-Vicente v. Commonwealth of PR
as 3:2020cv01123
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR
Plaintiff:
Ezequiel Diaz-Vicente
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bello et al v. Commonwealth of PR et al
as 3:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Juanita Bello and Federico Bello
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR, Municipality of Hormigueros, Pedro J. Garcia-Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re: Mandry-Mercado
as 16-2518
Petitioner:
JAVIER E. MANDRY-MERCADO
Respondent:
VANESSA LUGO-OBJIO, CONSEJO DE TITULARES CONDOMINIO EL SENORIAL, MANUEL ZENGOTITA, Former President of HOA and others
Sanchez-Ramirez v. Commonwealth of PR
as 3:2015cv02010
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Sanchez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberto et al v. Commonwealth of PR et al
as 3:2015cv01633
Plaintiff:
Sonia Roberto
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PR, Heriberto Soto-Cruz, Angel Nieves-Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Soto-Hernandez
as 3:2015cv01280
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Rivera-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Walter Soto-Hernandez, Cesar Miranda, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
