Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
Not Yet Classified:
LIBRE IMMIGRATION SERVICES, INC.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Nexus Services, Inc.
as 23-1836
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NEXUS SERVICES, INC., LIBRE BY NEXUS, INC., MICHEAL DONOVAN and others
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EX REL. v. Davidson
as 4:2021cv00004
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Co-Conservator Martin B. Davidson and Co-Conservator Lynne L. Davidson
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services doing business as Eastern State Hospital and David A Von Moll, Comptroller
3Rd Party Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Defendant:
Dennis M. Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, State of New York and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Outreach Calling, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07505
Defendant:
Outsource 3000, Inc., Outreach Calling, Inc., Damian Muziani and others
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Federal Trade Commission, Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and Paul R. Rodriguez, Acting Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
People of the State of California, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of New York, State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General and others
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01719
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH D. DEVOS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
Commonwealth Of Virginia Ex Rel v. Star
as 1:2019cv00202
Defendant:
Michael John Star
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Ex Rel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
