Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Outreach Calling, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07505
Defendant:
Outsource 3000, Inc., Outreach Calling, Inc., Damian Muziani and others
Plaintiff:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Federal Trade Commission, Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, and Paul R. Rodriguez, Acting Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. City of Alexandria
as 09-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and RICHARD BAIER, in his official capacity as Director of Transportation and Environmental Services for the City of Alexandria
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
RSI LEASING, INCORPORATED
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. City of Alexandria
as 09-1566
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and RICHARD BAIER, in his official capacity as Director of Transportation and Environmental Services for the City of Alexandria
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
RSI LEASING, INCORPORATED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALLERGAN, INC., ET AL
as 2:2008cv05135
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA , THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT , THE STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP , BIOGEN IDEC, INC. , CEPHALON, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Brenny Specialized, Inc. v. DCI, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01283
Plaintiff:
Brenny Specialized, Inc.
Defendant:
DCI, Inc., Commonwealth Of Virginia, Richard T. Higgs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
