Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. Sebelius et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00782
Plaintiff: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Defendant: Yvette Roubideaux, Kathleen Sebelius and Dean Seyler
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv01166
Plaintiff: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Defendant: Indian Health Service, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
National Wildlife Federation et al v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2001cv00640
Plaintiff: American Rivers, Inc., Columbia Riverkeeper, Federation of Fly Fishers and others
Unknown: Aaron C. Courtney, Aaron C. Courtney, Aaron C. Courtney and others
Intervenor Defendant: BPA Customer Group, Franklin County Farm Bureau Federation, Grant County Farm Bureau Federation and others
Amicu: Center for Tribal Water Advocacy, Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation and others
503) 222-2301 (fax: Clarkston Golf & Country Club
406) 675-4665 (fax: Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and Joseph P. Hovenkotter
509) 634-2387 (fax: Stephen H. Suagee
206) 448-0962 (fax: John B Arum
541) 737-3590 (fax: Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
410) 230-1389 (fax: Timothy M. Sullivan
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, State of Washington, U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers and others
208) 667-4695 (fax: Shannon D. Work
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of Oregon
206) 623-4986 (fax: Matthew A. Love and Matthew A. Love
360) 586-3454 (fax: Sheila D. Lynch and Sheila D. Lynch
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
USA v. Oregon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:1968cv00513
Intervenor Defendant: Alaska Trollers Association
503) 222-4428 (fax: Bradford H. Lamb
Amicu: Columbia River Fisherman's Protective Union, Lummi Inidan Nation, Northwest Gillnetter's Association and others
Intervenor: Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Nation and others
Respondent: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Unknown: Bruce E Didesch, Alan C Stay, Deborah E. Nelson and others
503) 226-0259 (fax: Robert C. Weaver, Jr.
509) 634-2387 (fax: Stephen H. Suagee and Stephen H. Suagee
503) 242-9001 (fax: Craig J. Dorsay and Lea Ann Easton
303) 673-9155 (fax: Christopher B. Leahy
202) 616-9667 (fax: Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon, Fred R. Disheroon and others
541) 737-3590 (fax: Dr. Howard F. Horton, Ph.D.
208) 334-2690 (fax: William Stuart Whelan
Defendant: Makah Tribe, State of Oregon and State of Washington
503) 467-7689 (fax: Robert S. Banks, Jr.
503) 947-4793 (fax: David Euan Leith
503) 226-0079 (fax: Lori Irish Bauman
Plaintiff: USA
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3371 Wildlife Under the Lacey Act
Joseph Pakootas, et al v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-35045
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOSEPH A. PAKOOTAS, an individual and enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, DONALD R. MICHEL, an individual and enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Coville Reservation and CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION
Defendant - Appellant: TECK COMINCO METALS, LTD., a Canadian corporation
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2009cv00342
Plaintiff: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, C Vernon Johnson and others
Defendant: Phil Anderson and Bruce Bjork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Joseph Pakootas, et al v. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-35951
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH A. PAKOOTAS, an individual and enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and DONALD R. MICHEL, an individual and enrolled member of the Confederated Tribes of the Coville Reservation
Plaintiff: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION
Defendant - Appellee: TECK COMINCO METALS, LTD., a Canadian corporation
Petitioner-intervenor - Appellant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. United States Forest Service
as 2:2008cv00322
Petitioner: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Manuel-Snidarich v. Allen et al
as 2:2008cv00282
Plaintiff: Toni J Manuel-Snidarich
Defendant: Mervel Eugene Allen, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and Colville Tribe Enterprise Corp
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Natl Wildlife Fed, et al v. State of Idaho, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-35011
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, IDAHO WILDLIFE FEDERATION, WASHINGTON WILDLIFE FEDERATION and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee: STATE OF OREGON
Defendant: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and others
Defendant-intervenor: NORTHWEST IRRIGATION UTILITIES, PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL, BPA CUSTOMER GROUP and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: STATE OF IDAHO
Amicu: PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING COOPERATIVE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION and others
Amicus Curiae: COLUMBIA -SNAKE RIVER IRRIGATORS ASSOCIATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?