Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Chester Marks v. Jeffrey McLerran, et al
as 19-15863
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET JOHNSON, Arizona Supreme Court Clerk Active under her color of state law being sued in her individual and official capacity, CONNIE CONTES, Arizona Court of Appeal Judge Active under color of state law being sued in her individual and official capacity, DOUGLAS GERLACHI, Superior Court Judge active under color of state law being sued in his individual and offical capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHESTER LEE MARKS
Marks v. McLerran et al
as 2:2019cv01640
Defendant:
Peter Silverman, Jeffrey McLerran, Janet Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Ives et al
as 2:2017cv01906
Plaintiff:
David Watson
Defendant:
Mike Ives, Caryn Wagner, Jerrod Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bey v. Contes et al
as 2:2016cv03611
Plaintiff:
Morah Ella Bey
Defendant:
Connie Contes and Arizona Department of Child Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sjothun v. Banner Gateway Medical Center et al
as 2:2015cv00680
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant:
Banner Gateway Medical Center, AZ/DCYF/CPS , Jeni Bilski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sjothun-Franklin et al v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2014cv02600
Plaintiff:
Joli Sjothun-Franklin and Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security , Clarence Carter , Gilbert Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sjothun v. Parker et al
as 2:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Diane Sjothun
Defendant:
Jackie Parker, Connie Contes, Edward Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isham v. Luder et al
as 2:2013cv01134
Plaintiff:
Michael Darrin Isham
Defendant:
Susan L Luder, Clayton Alec Lynas, Connie Contes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
