Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Makah Indian Tribe v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Makah Indian Tribe
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribes and Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, BP p.l.c. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Metro v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Respondent:
Shell PLC, Occidental Petroleum, TotalEnergies SE and others
Petitioner:
Metro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
County of Multnomah v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv01213
Defendant:
Shell PLC, Occidental Petroleum, Totalenergies Marketing USA and others
Plaintiff:
County of Multnomah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Conocophillips Alaska, Inc. v. Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
as 23-35512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35226
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae:
Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
