Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Powell #50575 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Robert Edward Powell
Respondent:
Arizona, State of, Ryan F Thornell, Kris Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tena v. Conover et al
as 4:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Laura Conover, Brad S Terrace and Joshua Moser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tena v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Pima, County of, Tucson, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Terrence Franklin
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Pima County Justice Court, Laura Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Laura Conover, Samantha Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obregon v. Napier et al
as 4:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Mario Armando Obregon
Defendant:
Mark Napier, Laura Conover and Chris Nanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Napier et al
as 4:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Mark Napier, Laura Conover, Deborah Bernini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Luke et al v. OneSource Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00456
Plaintiff:
Laurence Luke, Laurence Luke, Ross Sindelar and others
Defendant:
OneSource Technologies, Inc. and Epstein, Weber & Conover, PLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
