Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dining Alliance, Inc. et al v. National Produce Consultants, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00755
Plaintiff:
Dining Alliance, Inc. and Consolidated Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
National Produce Consultants. LLC , Anthony J Forsythe and William J Hermann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dining Alliance, Inc. et al v. National Produce Consultants, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv13898
Plaintiff:
Dining Alliance, Inc. and Consolidated Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
National Produce Consultants, LLC , Anthony J Forsythe and William J Hermann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City Of Galveston v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00253
Respondent:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc., CCI Housing, LLC , JP Morgan Chase and others
Petitioner:
City Of Galveston
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Roofing Supply Group - San Diego, LLC v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00682
Plaintiff:
Roofing Supply Group - San Diego, LLC
Defendant:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc., Don Leach and Westchester Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ruvalcaba et al v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00658
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruvalcaba , Julian Valdez , Ruben Ruvalcaba and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc. , Consolidated Concepts , Dustin Hill Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ruvalcaba et al v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2011at00188
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruvalcaba, Ruben Ruvalcaba, Francisco Ruvalcaba Sr. and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc., Balfour Beatty Construction Company, Inc., Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Ruvalcaba et al v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruvalcaba , Ruben Ruvalcaba , Francisco Ruvalcaba Sr. and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc. and Balfour Beatty Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
